Inheritance
Probate Disputes
Case Study

Inheritance and probate dispute mediation, the claimant claimed to be the executor named in the last will of her late mother whereby all assets, with a value of approximately £4,277,000 went to her. The defendants who were 3 other children of the deceased who would have benefited under earlier wills and codicils claimed that their late mother lacked testamentary capacity at the time of that last will, and that the previous will which benefited all of them more or less equally should stand.

It was alleged that their younger sister the claimant had induced their mother into making and signing another will, even if she hadn’t their late mother lacked testamentary capacity at the time anyway. Both camps blamed the other, alleging fraudulent activity, stealing of items, the list went on. Apparently over the years all of the children were given loans in cash for various things they wanted and required, 2 of the children had paid these back, and 2 had not. Items of furniture and jewellery had also been taken at some points by some of the siblings.

Although in a nursing home at the time of her death, reports from the late mother’s physician showed she was fully aware of what she was doing, the issue then turned to whether she had been coerced under the duress of the claimant to make this new will. With little if any evidence to prove either way why this new will had been created, all parties were looking at a very expensive trial as well as a difficult time in enforcing their claims.

The estate had already been eaten away with the sizable legal fees that had been incurred to date, which would be paid out of the siblings individual respective shares of the estate, once the inheritance tax, legal fees to date, possible legal fees of a trial that would need to take place had been accounted for the estate was going to be much lighter than anticipated.

Their manager suggested mediation which was arranged within a week, as this dispute had been going on for 10 months and thus a quick resolution was required.

In private session Sonia told the mediator that she felt that Giles thought he was better than her, a perfectionist, he had more experience on certain issues and therefore he would have to correct her work with regards to certain aspects because she had no knowledge or training in those areas.

Giles felt that if Sonia paid more attention and worked harder she could grasp the knowledge she required, he had never been trained he learnt everything as he went along, and if he did, so could she, in fact he did not think he was better than her at all.

The mediator highlighted to both of them one anothers issues and that we all work in different ways and have different levels of training needs. Sonia suggested that if Giles actually trained her up on various issues that could possibly prevent him from having to correct aspects of her work, Giles felt it was not his job to do this and he had too much on, however if their manager approved it, then he would. Both agreed that they needed to work alongside each other and be respectful to one another, and any future issues needed to be communicated to one another in an orderly manner.

At first they both had a few teething problems, however their manager reported 3 months after the mediation, they were working with each other rather than against and both of their figures had now improved.

The mediation took 1 day compared to the 10 months this workplace dispute had already gone on.

The mediation cost the employer a fraction of the thousands they would have had to spend, had they continued with an Employment Tribunal or Court action.

INHERITANCE PROBATE MEDIATION VIDEO

CLICK ON THE MEDIATORS
NAME TO VIEW THEIR WHOLE CV

Choose a Mediator
CHoose A MEDIATOR